Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Asymmetric Spatial Competition And Dynamics In Digitalization: Will Public R&D Support And Marketization Exacerbate Spatial Polarization?
ID_Doc 10982
Authors Du Z.-Y.; Wang Q.; Yu Y.
Year 2024
Published Cities, 152
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105224
Abstract This paper investigates the asymmetric spatial spillover effects of digital development across different types of cities. The results of the two-regime spatial Durbin models, using the panel data of 279 cities in China from 2011 to 2021, reveal the spatial polarization phenomenon in digitalization, where stronger cities such as smart cities, provincial capitals, and port cities become more dominant while weaker cities struggle to catch up. Increasing public R&D support leads to positive spatial spillover effects but exacerbates the spatial “Matthew effect” of digitalization. Additionally, marketization plays a moderating role by enhancing resource allocation efficiency and suppressing negative spatial spillover effects. Higher levels of marketization result in smaller digital gaps between cities. The findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers and stakeholders seeking to foster balanced and inclusive urban development in the digital age. © 2024
Author Keywords Digitalization; Marketization; Public R&D support; Spatial polarization; Two-regime spatial Durbin model


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
39337 View0.887Yu Y.; Zhang Q.; Song F.Non-Linear Impacts And Spatial Spillover Of Digital Finance On Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Study Of Smart Cities In ChinaSustainability (Switzerland), 15, 12 (2023)
9555 View0.876Yue H.; Wang F.; Zhang Q.; Lu D.Analyzing The Spatial Pattern And Driving Factors Of Urban Digital Economy: A Multiscale PerspectiveProfessional Geographer, 76, 6 (2024)
59664 View0.869Shu Y.; Deng N.; Bie A.; Wu Y.; Bao S.Unlocking The Role Of Smart Cities In Technological Innovation: Evidence From ChinaApplied Economics, 56, 58 (2024)
14201 View0.868Chen Y.; Li R.; Zeng E.-Y.; Li P.City Spatial Structure And Smart City Innovation: The Case Of ChinaIndustrial Management and Data Systems, 122, 10 (2022)
20893 View0.866Luo H.Does Smart City Construction Exacerbate Capital Misallocation? Spatial Spillovers, Digital Transformation, And Robotics ApplicationStructural Change and Economic Dynamics, 73 (2025)
20813 View0.863Guo X.; Zhang R.; Zhang Y.Do Companies Influenced By Smart Cities Pay More Attention To Green Governance? Mechanism And Optimal Spatial CorrelationChinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 22, 1 (2024)
31618 View0.861Ma D.; Zhu Q.Innovation In Emerging Economies: Research On The Digital Economy Driving High-Quality Green DevelopmentJournal of Business Research, 145 (2022)
44210 View0.86Yang P.-L.; Lin Z.-H.; Zhu Z.-N.; Ying F.-W.Re-Evaluating The Impact And Mechanism Of Digital Economy On Regional Pollution Intensity From The Perspective Of Spatial SpilloverEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 6 (2024)
29391 View0.86Song M.; Xiao Y.; Zhou Y.How Does The Smart City Policy Influence Digital Infrastructure? Spatial Evidence From ChinaLand, 12, 7 (2023)
55699 View0.858Xu W.; Zhou J.; Liu C.The Impact Of Digital Economy On Urban Carbon Emissions: Based On The Analysis Of Spatial EffectsDili Yanjiu, 41, 1 (2022)