Smart City Gnosys

Smart city article details

Title Assessing Urban Security And Safety Smartness: A Systematic Review Of Key Performance Indicators
ID_Doc 10808
Authors Gallardo-Amores F.J.; Del-Real C.; Díaz-Fernández A.M.
Year 2025
Published IET Smart Cities, 7, 1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/smc2.70000
Abstract The smart city framework has become a key approach to addressing urbanisation challenges over the last 2 decades. While KPIs have been developed for various smart city dimensions, security and safety remain underexplored. This paper addresses this gap through a systematic review of KPIs. The study examines how urban security and safety smartness is assessed, focusing on three questions: (RQ1) What indicators measure urban security and safety smartness? (RQ2) In which smart city dimensions are these KPIs located? (RQ3) How are these KPIs defined and quantified? Using PRISMA guidelines, databases including Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched, yielding 2369 sources. After screening, 38 studies were analysed. A total of 182 unique KPIs were identified and categorised into crime prevention and control (53), perceptions of safety (11), emergency and disaster management (50), and cybersecurity (68). Most KPIs focus on city outcomes, with fewer addressing smart technology functionalities. Definitions and measurement approaches lack consensus. This review identifies gaps in defining and measuring smart urban security and safety. Standardising KPIs and incorporating technology-specific metrics are key directions for future research. © 2025 The Author(s). IET Smart Cities published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
Author Keywords city design; city indexes; comparisons; governance; metrics; planning & policy; rankings; smart cities; smart cities standards


Similar Articles


Id Similarity Authors Title Published
47890 View0.9Laufs, J; Borrion, H; Bradford, BSecurity And The Smart City: A Systematic ReviewSUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 55 (2020)
4713 View0.893Tutak M.; Brodny J.A Smart City Is A Safe City: Analysis And Evaluation Of The State Of Crime And Safety In Polish CitiesSmart Cities, 6, 6 (2023)
10791 View0.886He L.Assessing The Smart City: A Review Of Metrics For Performance Assessment, Risk Assessment And Construction Ability AssessmentCogent Economics and Finance, 11, 2 (2023)
51671 View0.883Autero A.; de Moraes Batista Simão M.; Karppi I.Smart Urban Safety And Security: Interdisciplinary PerspectivesSmart Urban Safety and Security: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024)
19570 View0.88Kalaldeh M.; Tarawneh D.Development Of A Dynamic Quantitative Digital Model For The Measurement Of Smart City Maturity Level In The City Of AmmanInternational Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 18, 1 (2025)
17038 View0.877Lawelai H.; Purnomo E.P.; Nurmandi A.; Jovita H.; Baulete E.M.Cybersecurity Policy On Smart City Infrastructure: A Mapping Of New Threats And ProtectionsJournal of Science and Technology Policy Management (2025)
13762 View0.875Samarakkody A.; Amaratunga D.; Haigh R.Characterising Smartness To Make Smart Cities ResilientSustainability (Switzerland), 14, 19 (2022)
5433 View0.873Alshehri J.; Alhamed A.; Rahman M.M.H.A Systematic Literature Review On Cybersecurity Risk Management In Smart Cities6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication, ICAIIC 2024 (2024)
16557 View0.873Dashkevych O.; Portnov B.A.Criteria For Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature ReviewSustainability (Switzerland), 14, 8 (2022)
17030 View0.873James S.K.; Deepalakshmi P.Cybersecurity In Smart Cities: Integrating Advanced Technologies For Urban Infrastructure ProtectionIEMECON 2024 - 12th International Conference on Internet of Everything, Microwave, Embedded, Communication and Networks (2024)